ABOUT THE CHURCH OF PHILADELPHIA
GET TO KNOW THE PASTOR
ENOCH SPEAKS - The Pastor's Blog
STEPS TO CHRISTIAN GROWTH
BOOKSTORE
EXCERPTS FROM THE BOOK
ART GALLERY
BIBLE STUDIES
WOMEN OF VIRTUE
LENA'S LOVE
PASTOR'S CORNER
CHURCH ANNOUNCEMENTS
TRINITY FITNESS
THE CHRONICLES OF ENOCH
GLOBAL NEWS WATCH
HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS WATCH
END TIME EVENTS ANALYSIS
VISIONS AND PROPHECIES
DEMONOLOGY
MEN WITHOUT EQUAL Sine Pari
CONTACT US
LINKS

EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN CONFLICT OVER ALLOWING HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE AND GAY BISHOPS

By RICHARD N. OSTLING, AP Religion Writer Fri Jul 7, 8:18 AM ET

The Episcopal Church's split over homosexuality is getting worldwide attention, but a denomination of roughly equal numbers and stature in the United States — the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) — is similarly torn up by the issue.

And as with the Episcopalians, compromises have left both liberal and conservative activists unsatisfied.

The Presbyterian conflict entered a new phase when a June assembly in Birmingham, Ala., approved a two-sided unity plan. For the conservatives, a church law remains in place that requires clergy and lay officers to limit sex to man-woman marriage — in keeping with biblical teaching as it's been traditionally understood.

But liberals were granted new leeway for local congregations and regional presbyteries to sidestep that sexual law with particular nominees. So an openly gay minister or lay elder could take office if local Presbyterians hold the liberal position that the Bible is chiefly concerned with love and inclusiveness.

Now, both sides are spending the summer in strategy meetings, where plotting next steps is the order of the day.

The Rev. Michael Walker, executive director of the conservative Presbyterians for Renewal, said Monday that the "decision to allow something as central as sexual morality to be a matter for local determination" gutted Presbyterian principles. Still, he urged fellow conservatives not to quit the denomination for now.

Walker spoke in North Carolina at Montreat Conference Center to 1,000 conservatives during the first of four conferences by groups that oppose the Birmingham plan.

The day that flock departed Montreat, about 260 Presbyterians arrived for a radically different "Celebrating Common Ground" rally, where supporters of the unity plan included presidents of nine seminaries and 16 moderators (titular heads of the denomination who are elected for limited terms).

One speaker, Barbara Wheeler of New York's Auburn Theological Seminary, thinks the Birmingham plan provides helpful "space for the exercise of conscience" and will "wrest control of the church's agenda from a small number of groups that have a vested interest in keeping the church in combat mode."

Nonetheless, future conflicts seem unavoidable.

By Wheeler's estimate, two-thirds of active churchgoers still believe gay sex is sinful while a majority of clergy now disagree. Moreover, activists on both sides are unwilling to relent.

Complete repeal of the gay clergy ban remains the long-term goal of groups like the Covenant Network of Presbyterians. "We don't know how long the change will take, but it is coming," said the Rev. Kim Clayton Richter of Georgia's Columbia Theological Seminary. "And we feel the actions of this assembly are modest steps forward."

Repeal requires approval from a majority of regional presbyteries and on the last attempt in 2002, 73 percent voted conservative. The Birmingham plan was the only way to bring flexibility on the issue.

Meanwhile, activists from 14 conservative groups jointly served notice in a statement that "we cannot accept, support or tolerate" the Birmingham plan. Overturning it is now a central task, says Presbyterian Coalition's Executive Director Terry Schlossberg.

"There is a sovereign Lord, and we cannot say any trend is inevitable," she said.

In the wake of the Birmingham assembly, church tribunals will likely get a run of complaints against gay pastors — cases that will test the compromise.

Robert Gagnon of Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, author of the conservative magnum opus "The Bible and Homosexual Practice," thinks that "whether the denomination will stay together now depends in large measure" on whether the denomination's highest court eventually upholds the sexual law.

Despite all the tumult, there are reasons for the 2.3 million-member church to stay intact, even if it can't agree on such a seemingly basic issue. Schism would waste both time and vast sums of money in property lawsuits.

A simpler option operates in the more loosely knit Southern Baptist Convention, where some 1,800 congregations that oppose the conservative leadership simply ignore SBC meetings and send no money. Instead they attend Cooperative Baptist Fellowship meetings and obtain denomination-type services from the fellowship and other agencies. Such Internet-driven alliances among soul mates are growing in many denominations.

Walker told his Montreat audience that after Birmingham, nobody really agrees what Presbyterianism is any longer, which "encourages greater local control, and admits the weakness of our national identity." Other conservatives have indicated they're now focused on ways for congregations to exist largely apart from the denomination.

Though few congregations may officially leave in the short run, there's more danger of walkouts by individuals frustrated with the direction of the church: After decades of steady decline, denominational officials prudently projected a membership loss of 66,000 in 2007 and 85,000 in 2008.

 

Copyright © 2005-2009 by Rev. Dr. Ricardo E. Nuñez.  All Rights Reserved.

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.