ABOUT THE CHURCH OF PHILADELPHIA
GET TO KNOW THE PASTOR
ENOCH SPEAKS - The Pastor's Blog
STEPS TO CHRISTIAN GROWTH
BOOKSTORE
EXCERPTS FROM THE BOOK
ART GALLERY
BIBLE STUDIES
WOMEN OF VIRTUE
LENA'S LOVE
PASTOR'S CORNER
CHURCH ANNOUNCEMENTS
TRINITY FITNESS
THE CHRONICLES OF ENOCH
GLOBAL NEWS WATCH
HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS WATCH
END TIME EVENTS ANALYSIS
VISIONS AND PROPHECIES
DEMONOLOGY
MEN WITHOUT EQUAL Sine Pari
CONTACT US
LINKS

UN HITS IMPASSE ON TEXT CRITICIZING ISRAELI ATTACK

By Irwin Arieff July 27, 2006

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The U.N. Security Council failed to agree on a statement late on Wednesday condemning a deadly Israeli attack on a U.N. observer post in Lebanon after the United States blocked language that appeared critical of Israel.

During a daylong debate, council members made numerous changes to a text put forward by China, which lost one of the four officers killed in the attack.

Their patience ran out when Washington demanded the deletion of language condemning "any deliberate attack against U.N. personnel."

Qatar, the council's sole Arab member, then said it needed time to consult with its government overnight, and the deliberations adjourned until Thursday morning. A policy statement needs the approval of all 15 council members.

China's U.N. ambassador, Wang Guangya, called for a strong statement of condemnation after an Israeli air attack destroyed the U.N. post in southern Lebanon on Tuesday, killing peacekeepers from Austria, Canada, China and Finland.

The attack prompted U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to ask Israel to investigate what he termed the "apparently deliberate targeting" of the U.N. observer post.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, while expressing "deep sorrow" over the deaths and agreeing to an investigation, voiced shock at the suggestion the attack was deliberate.

Wang acknowledged it was important to preserve council unity but said the council had to show its concern for the safety of U.N. peacekeepers.

Asked whether the U.S. position might affect China's attitude toward American efforts for a resolution on Iran's nuclear program, now under negotiation, Wang indicated there might be some spillover.

"I think that all members will reflect, on what lessons, if there are any, (can be) learned from this episode," Wang said.

China's initial draft called for an immediate end to the fighting in Lebanon and referred to the "apparently deliberate targeting" of the U.N. troops by Israel.

U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said there was no evidence the attack was deliberate, and Wang agreed to take out the two phrases at a very early stage.

Hours later, U.S. envoy Molly Phee said the United States wanted language deleted expressing the council's condemnation of "any deliberate attack against U.N. personnel."

Phee filled in for Bolton who was in Washington preparing for a Senate confirmation hearing on Thursday on his nomination as U.N. ambassador.

 

 

Copyright © 2005-2009 by Rev. Dr. Ricardo E. Nuñez.  All Rights Reserved.

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.