ARCHAEOLOGISTS CHALLENGE LINK BETWEEN DEAD SEA SCROLLS AND ANCIENT SECT
By JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
archaeological evidence is raising more questions about the conventional interpretation linking the desolate ruins of an ancient
settlement known as Qumran
with the Dead Sea Scrolls, which were found in nearby caves in one of the sensational discoveries of the last century.
After early excavations at the site, on a promontory above the western shore
of the Dead Sea, scholars concluded that members of a strict Jewish sect, the Essenes, had
lived there in a monastery and presumably wrote the scrolls in the first centuries B.C. and A.D.
Many of the texts describe religious practices
and doctrine in ancient Israel.
But two Israeli archaeologists who have excavated
the site on and off for more than 10 years now assert that Qumran had nothing to do with
the Essenes or a monastery or the scrolls. It had been a pottery factory.
The archaeologists, Yizhak Magen and Yuval
Peleg of the Israel Antiquities Authority, reported in a book and a related magazine article that their extensive excavations
turned up pottery kilns, whole vessels, production rejects and thousands of clay fragments. Derelict water reservoirs held
thick deposits of fine potters’ clay.
Dr. Magen and Dr. Peleg said that, indeed,
the elaborate water system at Qumran appeared to be designed to bring the clay-laced water
into the site for the purposes of the pottery industry. No other site in the region has been found to have such a water system.
By the time the Romans destroyed Qumran in A.D. 68 in the Jewish revolt, the archaeologists concluded, the settlement had been a center
of the pottery industry for at least a century. Before that, the site apparently was an outpost in a chain of fortresses along
the Israelites’ eastern frontier.
“The association between Qumran,
the caves and the scrolls is, thus, a hypothesis lacking any factual archaeological basis,” Dr. Magen said in an article
in the current issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.
He and Dr. Peleg wrote a more detailed report
of their research in “The Site of the Dead Sea Scrolls: Archaeological Interpretations and Debates,” published
this year. The book was edited by Katharina Galor of Brown, Jean-Baptiste Humbert of the French Biblical and Archaeological
School of Jerusalem, and Jürgen Zangenberg of the University of Wuppertal
This is by no means the first challenge to
the Essene hypothesis originally advanced by Roland de Vaux, a French priest and archaeologist who was an early interpreter
of the scrolls after their discovery almost 60 years ago. Other scholars have suggested that Qumran
was a fortified manor house or a villa, possibly an agricultural community or a commercial entrepôt.
Norman Golb, a professor of Near Eastern languages
and civilization at the University of Chicago
who is a longtime critic of the Essene link, said he was impressed by the new findings and the pottery-factory interpretation.
“Magen’s a very seasoned archaeologist
and scholar, and many of his views are cogent,” Dr. Golb said in a telephone interview. “A pottery factory? That
could well be the case.”
Dr. Golb said that, of course, Qumran
could have been both a monastery and a pottery factory. Yet, he added: “There is not an iota of evidence that it was
a monastery. We have come to see it as a secular site, not one of pronounced religious orientation.”
For years, Dr. Golb has argued that the multiplicity
of Jewish religious ideas and practices recorded in the scrolls made it unlikely that they were the work of a single sect
like the Essenes. He noted that few of the texts dealt with specific Essene traditions. Not one, he said, espoused celibacy,
which the sect practiced.
The scrolls in the caves were probably written
by many different groups, Dr. Golb surmised, and were removed from Jerusalem
libraries by refugees in the Roman war. Fleeing to the east, the refugees may well have deposited the scrolls for safekeeping
in the many caves near Qumran.
The new research appears to support this view.
As Dr. Magen noted, Qumran in those days was at a major crossroads of traffic to and from Jerusalem
and along the Dead Sea. Similar scrolls have been found at Masada, the site south of Qumran of the suicidal hold-out against the Romans.
Dr. Magen also cited documents showing that
refugees in another revolt against the Romans in the next century had fled to the same caves. He said they were “the
last spot they could hide the scrolls before descending to the shore” of the Dead Sea.
In the magazine article, Dr. Magen said the
jars in which most of the scrolls were stored had probably come from the pottery factory. If so, this may prove to be the
only established connection between the Qumran settlement and the scrolls.
Despite the rising tide of revisionist thinking,
other scholars of the Dead Sea scrolls continue to defend the Essene hypothesis, though with
some modifications and diminishing conviction.