ABOUT THE CHURCH OF PHILADELPHIA
GET TO KNOW THE PASTOR
ENOCH SPEAKS - The Pastor's Blog
STEPS TO CHRISTIAN GROWTH
BOOKSTORE
EXCERPTS FROM THE BOOK
ART GALLERY
BIBLE STUDIES
WOMEN OF VIRTUE
LENA'S LOVE
PASTOR'S CORNER
CHURCH ANNOUNCEMENTS
TRINITY FITNESS
THE CHRONICLES OF ENOCH
GLOBAL NEWS WATCH
HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS WATCH
END TIME EVENTS ANALYSIS
VISIONS AND PROPHECIES
DEMONOLOGY
MEN WITHOUT EQUAL Sine Pari
CONTACT US
LINKS

LEBANON SENDS NATIONAL ARMY TO PATROL SOUTH

By JOHN KIFNER and ROBERT F. WORTH

Published: August 17, 2006

BEIRUT, Lebanon, Thursday, Aug. 17 — The Lebanese Army moved into the country’s south at dawn on Thursday, a day after the cabinet approved the deployment under a United Nations-mandated cease-fire, but finessed the delicate issue of disarming Hezbollah.

At several points, soldiers crossed the Litani River, about 15 miles north of the Israeli border, into the long-held separate realm of Hezbollah.

A column of more than 100 trucks, troop carriers and jeeps, flying red-and-white Lebanese flags, streamed through a makeshift bridge on the Litani to the town of Merj ’Uyun, Reuters reported. Some vehicles towed artillery pieces, others carried troops and equipment.

Hezbollah fighters were not expected to resist the soldiers, nor to hand over their weapons. Instead, they probably would simply put their weapons into hiding and melt away into the civilian population.

The top Hezbollah field commander in the south, Sheik Nabil Qaouk, said as much on Wednesday.

“Just like in the past, Hezbollah had no visible military presence and there will not be any presence now,” Sheik Qaouk told reporters in the hard-hit port city of Tyre.

He praised the army’s deployment, but said Hezbollah would maintain its presence without displaying its arms. He added that since Israeli tanks were still in Lebanon, the guerrillas reserved the right to respond accordingly. A Hezbollah representative in Parliament, Hassan Fadlallah, was equally insistent, telling Al Jazeera television that his organization would not pull back over the Litani, that the fate of its arsenal was not open to public debate and that the army deployment had nothing to do with its presence.

Whether this approach would satisfy the terms of the Security Council resolution that calls for the disarming of nongovernment forces, particularly in the eyes of Israel, the United States and potential contributors to an international peacekeeping force, remained in doubt.

In Israel, skepticism about the plan was evident. Still, the Israeli Army said Wednesday that it had started to hand over positions in Lebanon to United Nations troops.

Hezbollah guerrillas, known in Lebanon as “the resistance,” have operated in the south for years. They are almost entirely local men hardened by 18 years of Israeli occupation after its 1982 invasion.

During that time, they lived and worked in their native villages, building an elaborate social-service network and extensive underground fortifications and stashes of modern weaponry that astounded Israel in a month of bitter fighting. “No one knew they had these things, not the military, not the intelligence,” said an equally astonished Lebanese Army general, speaking privately.

After the vote by the cabinet, which has two Hezbollah ministers, Prime Minister Fouad Siniora went on television with a lengthy, sometimes emotional, appeal for unity, expressing a wan hope that Hezbollah’s arms would somehow disappear. The army deployment, he said, would end a “mentality of statelets.”

“There will be a single state,” he said, “with the sole decision-making power. There will be no dual authority. There will be no armed presence outside state authority,” he said without referring to Hezbollah by name. “Any failure to carry out this right will risk our country’s becoming the scene of regional and international conflicts.”

In Israel there were, to say the least, strong doubts about the plan.

Danny Yatom, a Parliament member who is a former director of the Mossad intelligence service, said, “There is no doubt that Hezbollah must follow the decision in its entirety, and it is the responsibility of the Americans and the French as well as the other members of the Security Council and the government of Lebanon to bring about the disarmament of Hezbollah and have it driven up north past the Litani.”

A Likud member, Yuval Steinitz, said: “Whoever does not complete the annihilation of the enemy must not be surprised that the enemy does not volunteer to annihilate itself. Israel should have taken over southern Lebanon and cleaned out Hezbollah several weeks ago, and unless this is done now, Israel will be forced to do it sometime in the future.”

Amid the growing debate in Israel over the handling of the war, Israel’s defense minister, Amir Peretz, appointed a panel to investigate how the military and the ministry had performed. The panel will be headed by Ammon Lipkin-Shahak, a former army chief of staff, and will include a number of other retired generals.

Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy of France met in Beirut with Mr. Siniora to discuss the possible composition and dispatch of a strengthened United Nations force. France is expected to form the backbone of the force, but it is still uncertain what other nations will join the effort, which is expected to number about 15,000 troops. Some 45 countries have expressed interest.

In Berlin, the German government said it would not send troops but would provide policing for the Syrian border, naval patrols and engineers to rebuild bombed bridges.

In the hard-hit Shiite suburbs south of Beirut, Hezbollah supporters fanned out to assess war damage. Around them, residents and visitors wandered in stunned silence through a charred, bombed-out landscape. Someone had hung a banner with the words “Made in U.S.A.” over the ruins of a collapsed building.

Here and there, gunmen could be seen watching over the streets. But the group’s army of civilian volunteers and its advance plans for rebuilding were far more apparent.

One man walked down a rubble-strewn street holding a stack of damage assessment forms. He carried a baseball cap with the name and symbol of Jihad al Binaa, the Hezbollah reconstruction committee. “This not overnight work,” said the volunteer, a 30-year-old architect who declined to give his name. “The work being done now was prepared over the past month, with the collaboration of architects and engineers.”

His map included numbers for each building on the small sector he had been assigned. There were forms for each building, with spaces for the names of every resident and a description of damage to the units and needs. Photographs were being taken, to be used as comparison after the rebuilding has been done, he said.

He is one of 250 to 300 architects and engineers already assessing damage, he said, and the group hopes to finish 70 percent of that work in the Dahia, or Shiite suburban area, this week. Then will come the second and third phases, he said, with the group reimbursing residents for damage and starting rebuilding.

The plans also include a strong dose of publicity for Hezbollah. A few blocks away, volunteers had set up a tent and plastic chairs for the news media, and Ghassan Darwish, the group’s Beirut information officer, was giving interviews.

The group divided the Dahia into 70 districts, each with two to four buildings in it, Mr. Darwish said. The goal was to get people back into their homes, or into alternative houses, or to give them enough cash to rent another apartment, within 72 hours, he said. In the meantime, a team of architects was being assembled, he said, from Dubai, Qatar, Egypt and Syria as well as Lebanon, to reconstruct the entire Dahia within a year. The money, he said, was coming from “people who hate Israel and believe in the resistance.”

“There is contact between us and the government,” Mr. Darwish said. “But we won’t wait for the bureaucracy. These are the people who protected the resistance, and we believe they have the right to roofs over their heads within 24 hours.”

Down the street, Amina Qausan, a 39-year-old shopkeeper in a gray abaya, looked through the ruins of her clothing store. The floor was littered with glass and rubble, and the walls had come down in the back of the shop. The women’s dresses she sells were covered with dust.

“There has been no theft, and this is because of the good men of the resistance,” she said. “In every place there are people who commit crimes, but with Hezbollah patrolling that cannot happen.”

At least 200,000 people have already returned to the Dahia area, said Robin Lodge of the United Nations World Food Program, which is providing aid throughout Lebanon.

Although Hezbollah is aiming to draw new support with its rebuilding campaign, some say the group could suffer as the reality of the war’s damage sinks in.

“For the next two or three years, Hezbollah will be like the Salvation Army, tied up in rebuilding,” said Michael Young, the opinion editor at The Daily Star, an English-language newspaper published in Beirut. “But the party cannot put Shiites through such trauma again for the foreseeable future, maybe a decade, which means its ability to attack Israel will be limited. The reason Hezbollah is so eager to rebuild is that they know the condition of Shiites today could turn the community against them if it’s not dealt with effectively.”

 

Copyright © 2005-2009 by Rev. Dr. Ricardo E. Nuñez.  All Rights Reserved.

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.