IMPLANTED MICROCHIPS CAUSE CANCER
By Jane
Williams GFN contributing writer--- (For Publication in the January 2007 "American Family Voice")
At the National
ID Expo in Kansas City, Arkansas Animal Producer's Association President
Michael Steenbergen asked, "What safety studies have been conducted on the chips that are inserted into animals?" His
question was met with total silence. Did these manufacturers not know, or were they unwilling to admit that research
has confirmed that implanted microchips cause cancer?
Melvin T. Massey, DVM (Doctor of Veterinary Medicine) from
Brownsboro,Texas, brought
this to the attention of the American Horse Council when he wrote, "I am a retired Equine Veterinarian and still breed
a few horses. Because of migration-infection s-increased risk of sarcoids I will not want to have microchips in my horses."
The
Institute of Experimental Pathology at Hannover Medical School in
Germany reported , "An experiment using
4279 CBA/J mice of two generations was carried out to investigate the influence of parental preconceptual exposure
to X-ray radiation or to chemical carcinogens. Microchips were implanted subcutaneously in the dorsolateral back for unique
identification of each animal. The animals were kept for lifespan under standard laboratory conditions. In 36 mice a circumscribed
neoplasm occurred in the area of the implanted microchip. Macroscopically, firm, pale white nodules up to 25 mm in
diameter with the microchip in its center were found. Macroscopically, soft tissue tumors such as fibrosarcoma and
malignant fibrous histiocytoma were detected."
Ecole Nationale Veterinaire of Unite d'Anatomie Pathologique in
Nantes, France,
reported, "Fifty-two subcutaneous tumors associated with microchip were collected from three carcinigenicity B6C3F1 micestudies.
Two of these 52 tumors were adenocarcinoma of the mammary gland located on the dorsal region forming around the chip.
All the other 50 were mesenchymal in ori! gin and were difficult to classify on morphological grounds with haematoxylin-eosin."
Marta
Vascellari of Instituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie at Viale dell'Universita in Legnaro, Italy reported examining a 9-year-old
male French Bulldog for a subcutaneous mass located at the site of a microchip implant. "The mass was confirmed as a high-grade
infiltrative fibrosarcoma,with multifocal necrosis and peripheral lymphoid aggregates."
The Toxicology Department
of Bayer Corporation in Stillwell, Kansas
reported, "Tumors surrounding implanted microchip animal identification devices were noted in two separate chronic
toxicity/oncogenici ty studies using F344 rats. The tumors occurred at a low incidence rate (approximately 1%), but
did result in the early sacrifice of most affected animals, due to tumor size and occasional metastases. No sex-related
trends were noted.
All tumors occurred during the second year of the studies, were located in the subcutaneous
dorsal thoracic area (the site of microchip implantation) and contained embedded microchip devices. All were mesenchymal
in origin and consisted of the following types, listed on order of frequency: malignant schwannoma, fibrosarcoma, anaplastic
sarcoma, and histiocytic sarcoma.
The following diagnostic techniques were employed: light microscopy, scanning
electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry. The mechanism of carcinogenicity appeared to be that of foreign body induced tumorigenesis.
"
Additional studies related to cancer tumors at the site of microchip implants have been conduced in China; however, at this time these studies are not available
in English. At this time, no long term studies are available covering more than two years. It only seems logical to conclude
that if carcinogenic tumors occur within one percent of animals implanted within two years of the implant that the percentage
would increase with the passage of time. Additional studies need to be conducted, but don't hold ! your bre ath for
the manufacturers of microchips to conduct such research and be leery of any such "research" they may conduct. Even
the limited research available clearly indicates that implantation of microchips within an animal is gambling with the
animal's well being.
|
Copyright © 2005-2009 by Rev. Dr.
Ricardo E. Nuñez. All Rights Reserved.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized
by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of
any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
|
|