ABOUT THE CHURCH OF PHILADELPHIA
GET TO KNOW THE PASTOR
ENOCH SPEAKS - The Pastor's Blog
STEPS TO CHRISTIAN GROWTH
BOOKSTORE
EXCERPTS FROM THE BOOK
ART GALLERY
BIBLE STUDIES
WOMEN OF VIRTUE
LENA'S LOVE
PASTOR'S CORNER
CHURCH ANNOUNCEMENTS
TRINITY FITNESS
THE CHRONICLES OF ENOCH
GLOBAL NEWS WATCH
HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS WATCH
END TIME EVENTS ANALYSIS
VISIONS AND PROPHECIES
DEMONOLOGY
MEN WITHOUT EQUAL Sine Pari
CONTACT US
LINKS

May 24, 2007 1:19 pm US/Eastern

S. FLA. ALZHEIMER'S CENTER TO MICROCHIP PATIENTS

VeriChip Is Only Company Approved To Implant Chips In People

Chips Provide Access To Patient's Medical History

WEST PALM BEACH A popular identification system for lost animals, called a microchip implant, has proven to be quite popular with pet owners, but now plans by a West Palm Beach Alzheimer’s care center to place microchips into its patients are drawing a bit of controversy.

The Alzheimer’s Community Care Center is launching a trial program that could help families that are caring for an elderly parent or loved one.

The center is implanting 200-patients with a tiny microchip, made by VeriChip. The chip lies dormant without a battery or a power source. It’s encoded with a 16-digit identification number that can be scanned and entered into a computer to access a patient’s medical history.

"Having this type of ID and having this type of technology to get the kind of assistance they need right away can be lifesaving. Our patients are so fragile and vulnerable," said the CEO of Alzheimer's Community Care Mary Barnes.

She emphasized, “No personal information is stored on the microchip. Individuals who choose to participate in this project will have signed informed consents by the patient or legal authorized representative.”

In addition, she said, no person will receive the VeriMed microchip without the involvement of a physician. She noted that the program is free and offered on a voluntary basis.

But not everyone agrees with the use of the microchip, which is the same kind of chip used to identify pets when they are lost.

Dr. Katherine Albrecht, founder of the consumer privacy group, CASPIAN (Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering) has already held a protest outside the Alzheimer’s Community Care center. She also has a web site that lists objections to the microchip.

Albrecht said this technology is not necessary. For years, she said hospital patients and those with certain allergies or medical conditions have been wearing bracelets or other types of identification to point out their maladies.

There are many who question the ethics of conducting medical research on mentally impaired individuals because Alzheimer’s patients cannot understand the risks associated with being micro chipped and therefore cannot give fully informed consent.

Albrecht compares the large-scale chip implantation plans to an assembly line that would render elderly patients scannable "like bar-coded packages of meat," adding that the societal implications of such a move would be chilling.

The VeriChip Corporation emphasizes that its chip, which was approved for use in October 2004, should always be strictly voluntary. VeriChip is the only company with U.S. federal approval to implant such chips in people. The company has implanted more than 2,500 people worldwide.

According to the FDA, risks associated with the VeriChip include MRI incompatibility, electrical hazard, and adverse tissue reaction, to name just a few.

In February, a Cincinnati surveillance equipment company became the first U.S. business to allow employees to get chip implants to enter secure rooms. Some employees in the Mexico attorney general's office have also been implanted with chips for this us
e.

Copyright © 2005-2009 by Rev. Dr. Ricardo E. Nuñez.  All Rights Reserved.

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.