BUY STAKES IN THE U.S. AT A RECORD PACE
Last May, a Saudi Arabian conglomerate bought a Massachusetts plastics maker. In November, a French company established a new factory in
Adrian, Mich., adding 189
automotive jobs to an area accustomed to layoffs. In December, a British company bought a New Jersey maker of cough syrup.
For much of the world, the United States is now on sale at discount prices. With credit tight, unemployment
growing and worries mounting about a potential recession, American business and government leaders are courting foreign money
to keep the economy growing. Foreign investors are buying aggressively, taking advantage of American duress and a weak dollar
to snap up what many see as bargains, while making inroads to the world’s largest market.
Last year, foreign
investors poured a record $414 billion into securing stakes in American companies, factories and other properties through
private deals and purchases of publicly traded stock, according to Thomson Financial, a research firm. That was up 90 percent
from the previous year and more than double the average for the last decade. It amounted to more than one-fourth of all announced
deals for the year, Thomson said.
During the first two weeks of this year, foreign businesses agreed to invest another
$22.6 billion for stakes in American companies — more than half the value of all announced deals. If a recession now
unfolds and the dollar drops further, the pace could accelerate, economists say.
The surge of foreign money has injected
fresh tension into a running debate about America’s
place in the global economy. It has supplied state governors with a new development strategy — attracting foreign money.
And it has reinvigorated sometimes jingoistic worries about foreigners securing control of America’s
fortunes, a narrative last heard in the 1980s as Americans bought up Hondas and Rockefeller
Center landed in Japanese hands.
With a growing share of investment
coming from so-called sovereign wealth funds — vast pools of money controlled by governments from China to the Middle
East — lawmakers and regulators are calling for greater scrutiny to ensure that foreign countries do not gain influence
over the financial system or military-related technology. On the presidential campaign trail, the Democratic candidates have
begun to focus on these foreign funds, calling for international rules that would make them more transparent.
is swirling in Washington about the best way to stimulate
a flagging economy. Despite divided opinion about the merits, foreign investment may be preventing deeper troubles by infusing
hard-luck companies with cash and keeping some in business.
The most conspicuous beneficiaries are Wall Street banks
like Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley, which have sold stakes to government-controlled funds in Asia and the Middle East to compensate for calamitous losses on mortgage markets. Beneath the headlines, a more profound
shift is under way: Foreign entities last year captured stakes in American companies in businesses as diverse as real estate,
steel-making, energy and baby food.
The influx is the result of a confluence of factors that have made the United States both reliant on the largesse of foreigners and
an alluring place for opportunistic investors. With American banks reeling from the housing downturn and loath to lend, businesses
are hungry for cash.
The weak dollar has made American companies and properties cheaper in global terms, particularly
for European and Canadian buyers. Even as Americans confront the prospect of a recession, economic growth remains strong worldwide,
endowing oil producers like Saudi Arabia and Russia
and export powers like China and Germany with abundant cash.
As the German company ThyssenKrupp Stainless
broke ground in November on what is to be a $3.7 billion stainless steel plant in Calvert, Ala., its executives spoke effusively
about the low cost of production in the United States and the chance to reach many millions of customers — particularly
because of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which allows goods to flow into Mexico and Canada free of duty.
Nafta stainless steel market has great potential, and we’re committed to significantly expanding our business in this
growth region,” said the company’s chairman, Jürgen H. Fechter, according to a statement.
like Toyota Motor and Sony have been sinking capital into American plants. Investment in the American subsidiaries of foreign
companies grew to $43.3 billion last year from $39.2 billion the previous year, according to the research and consulting firm
“This is a vote of confidence in the American economy, the American marketplace and the American
worker,” the deputy Treasury secretary, Robert M. Kimmitt, said. “These investments keep Americans employed and
keep balance sheets strong.”
Five million Americans now work for foreign companies set up in the United States, Mr. Kimmitt said, and those jobs pay 30 percent
more than similar work at domestic companies. Nearly a third of such jobs are in manufacturing, which explains why Rust Belt
states have been wooing foreign investment.
“We’ve lost 400,000 manufacturing jobs,” said Michigan’s governor, Jennifer M. Granholm, a Democrat, who has traveled three times to Europe
and twice to Japan in pursuit of investment
since taking office in 2003. “I’ve got to get jobs for our people.”
Some labor unions see the acceleration
of foreign takeovers as the latest indignity wrought by globalization.
“It’s the culmination of a series
of fool’s errands,” said Leo W. Gerard, international president of the United Steelworkers. “We’ve
hollowed out our industrial base and run up this massive trade deficit, and now the countries that have built the deficits
are coming back to buy up our assets. It’s like spitting in your face.”
Other labor groups take a more
“We need investment and we need to create good jobs,” said Thea Lee, policy director for
the A.F.L.-C.I.O. in Washington. “We’re not
in the position to be too choosy about where that investment comes from. But it does bring home the consequences of flawed
trade policies over many, many years that we’re in this position of being dependent.”
At the center of
concern is the growing influence of sovereign wealth funds, which invested $21.5 billion in American companies last year,
according to Thomson. Analysts say they could skew markets by investing to improve the fortunes of their national companies
or to pursue political goals.
“This is a phenomenon that could be called the growth of state capitalism as opposed
to market capitalism,” said Jeffrey E. Garten, a trade expert at the Yale School of Management. “The United States has not ever been on the receiving end of this
Perhaps emblematic of national ambivalence, in an appearance on CNBC last week, the voluble market analyst
Jim Cramer spoke in menacing terms about the growing role of state investment funds from the Middle East and China.
“Do we want the communists to own the
banks, or the terrorists?” Mr. Cramer asked. “I’ll take any of it, I guess, because we’re so desperate.”
of investment from overseas note that finance from sovereign wealth funds is a mere trickle of the overall flow from abroad.
Indeed, the bulk comes from Europe, Canada and Japan. Just as Americans have scattered investments around the world in pursuit
of profit — with holdings of foreign stock and debt exceeding $6 trillion in 2006, according to the Treasury Department
— foreigners are looking to the United States,
with their capital generating economic activity, proponents say.
If fear of foreign money now inspires Americans to
erect new barriers, that would damage the economy, said Todd M. Malan, president of the Organization for International Investment,
a Washington lobbying group financed by foreign companies.
policy choices on the negative side would have enormous economic implications that would make the current situation look like
a bubble bath,” he said.
Tensions spawned by foreign investment hark back to the 1980s, when Japan snapped up prominent American businesses like Columbia
Pictures, and some intoned that the American way of life was under assault. The new wave of foreign money is washing in at
an even more important time, analysts say.
The United States
has lost more than three million manufacturing jobs since 2001, with foreign trade often taking the blame. Foreign-made goods
now account for roughly one-third of all wares consumed in the United States,
roughly tripling their share over the last quarter-century. The soaring price of oil and a widening trade deficit underscore
how the American economy is increasingly vulnerable to decisions made far away.
In 2005, Congressional opposition scuttled
a bid by the state-owned Chinese energy company Cnooc to buy the American oil company Unocal. The following year, furor on
Capitol Hill prevented DP World, a company based in the United Arab Emirates,
from buying several major American ports.
No such outcry has greeted the purchase of stakes in major Wall Street banks
by state investment funds in the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, China, Singapore
and South Korea. This is largely because
the banks sold passive slices and ceded no formal control, which would have set off a federal review of the national security
implications. But the silence also reflects the imperative that these enormous institutions swiftly secure cash.
would be good if these companies didn’t need all this capital and better if the capital was available in the United States,” said Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat
of New York, who was a vocal opponent of the DP World deal. “But given the situation that these institutions find themselves
in and the fact that there’s a pretty strong credit squeeze, there’s only two choices: Have foreign companies
invest in these firms or have massive layoffs.”
In years past, particularly when Japanese money washed in, many
foreign purchases proved not to be so prudent in the end. This time, with the dollar weak and troubled American companies
in a poor bargaining position, the prices really do seem cheap, some economists say.
“They’re buying financial
assets at well under book value,” said Gary C. Hufbauer, a trade expert at the Peterson Institute for International
Trade experts assume tensions will rise as developing countries — which tend to have more state companies
— continue to expand their share of investment in the United States.
Canada still spends the most money buying stakes in American
companies — more than $65 billion in 2007, according to Thomson. But other countries’ purchases are growing rapidly.
South Korea’s investments swelled
to more than $10.4 billion last year from just $5.4 million in 2000. Russia
went to $572 million from $60 million in that span; India
to $3.3 billion from $364 million.
But even if political tension increases, so will the flow of foreign money, some
analysts say, for the simple reason that businesses need it.
“The forces sucking in this capital are much bigger
than the political forces,” said Mr. Garten, the Yale trade expert. “If there is a big controversy, it will be
between Washington on the one hand and corporate America on the other. In that contest, the financiers and the businessmen are going
to win, as they always do.”